Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Editor » Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:57 pm




All whilst the prestitutes keep the sheeple distracted with irrelevant dross..
Editor
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Editor » Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:57 pm

Abdelbaset Al Megrahi might have passed away :
http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&c ... gM&topic=h

The prestitutes stating "Lockerbie bomber" .. SORRY .. BUT EVIDENCE IS THAT HE WAS FRAMED FOR IT.
Editor
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Editor » Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:49 am

http://www.spiderednews.com/CivilSociet ... 324512.stm
Police review Lockerbie bomb case

Detectives in Scotland are pursuing several lines of inquiry as they renew the investigation into the Lockerbie bombing case.

Prosecutors say Libyan Abdelbasset Ali al-Megrahi - who was convicted in 2001 of the murder of 270 people but freed in August - was not working alone.


BREAKING NEWS : Email found from Ahmadinejad to Al-Megrahi giving instructions for where and when to plant the bomb, and sending a bunch of flowers as a thank you afterwards. </satire>

The above is actually quite sickening .. Al Megrahi was innocent .. the chain of evidence was broken .. the evidence was fabricated .. but hey, the west can target a second (and then third etc.) Muslim country .. and maybe we find out in the end that the N. Koreans (or Chinese) helped one of these muslim countries ..
Editor
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Editor » Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:07 pm

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commen ... 889766.ece
Lockerbie: was this man’s memory reliable?

A key witness who identified al-Megrahi shows the classic signs of having come to believe in something that never happened
Editor
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Red Dawn » Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:53 pm

26 Oct 2009

"Exclusive: Cynicism and doubt over latest Crown Office “spoiler”...

http://tinyurl.com/yl6eb78



25 Oct 2009

"UK Families Flight 103 Ask Gordon Brown to Instigate a Full Independent Inquiry into the Lockerbie Events"...

http://tinyurl.com/ykfet3z
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite"
Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) ... http://bigeye.com/foolisholdman.htm
Red Dawn
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:37 pm

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Editor » Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:31 am

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 890191.ece
Eight Lockerbie suspects were never interviewed, says former police chief

It is thought that the “high level” suspects were all male and have never been ruled out of the investigation into the explosion onboard Pan Am Flight 103, which killed 270 on December 21, 1988.

News of the new suspects comes as relatives of those who died in the disaster said they feared the police investigation was being stepped up in an attempt to scupper demands for a full public inquiry.


Mandelson stopping so low as to do this 21 years after the coverup ? NEVER ....

I repeat 21 YEARS after Lockerbie, suddently we hear about new high level "suspects" .. Maybe they want to go after Gaddafi now. They couldn't do before whilst the appeal was outstanding .. and if the Libyans ever thought the claims would go higher up the chain of command they would NEVER have allowed the recent appeal to be stopped.

The Libyans fell into a trap by allowing humanitarian concerns and pressure force their hand by dropping the appeal. ETERNAL SHAME on the ones applying the pressure.

Dr Jim Swire, who lost his daughter Flora in the bombing, said: “The argument which has been consistently used against us having the public inquiry we want is that there is an ongoing criminal investigation. I find it an extraordinary coincidence that the latest development in the police case emerged on the same day the families demanded a proper investigation from Gordon Brown.”

Fears that the police investigation was being used as a delaying tactic were last night dismissed by a leading Scottish QC. Paul McBride said: “What would they rather have, a public inquiry or three other people involved in the bombing of their children convicted and put in jail?”


Mr Stupid Paul McBride QC = Crown shit shoveller : WHY DON'T YOU ASK MR SQUIRE AND OTHER FAMILIES WHAT HE WANTS .. I BET AT THIS STAGE THEY WOULD RATHER A PUBLIC ENQUIRY INSTEAD OF ANOTHER TRIAL .. THEY HAVE SEEN WHAT HAPPENS AT TRIALS = MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE / TAINTED AND FABRICATED EVIDENCE / JUDICIAL DELAYS AND DOUBLE DEALINGS / BACKGROUND PRESSURE TO PREVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE ...

Indeed 21 years after the event, any SENIOR suspect must have been 40+ in 1988, which makes in 61+ years now .. how could any court which will likely last years or even decades be contemplated ... Remember Pinnochet was let go BY A BRITISH COURT because he was senile ..

As if the new "suspects" wouldn't make their first defence that the evidence against Megrahi was fabricated and he was innocent. That is a valid defence, and can't be legally blocked.

Note the comments .. almost all anti-government, especially :
Paul McBride QC said: “What would they rather have, a public inquiry or three other people involved in the bombing of their children convicted and put in jail? A public inquiry would be completely inappropriate and could jeopardise a trial.”

Leaving aside the extraordinary arrogance of this statement, let us consider:
1) The families have repeatedly stated they want a public inquiry;
2) The original criminal trial is widely regarded as one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British history (and is deserving of a public inquiry in its own right);
3) The enormous leaps of (il)logic performed by the judges and barristers (Paul McBride take note) in the original trial.

It is time, nearly 21 years after the worst atrocity in British history, that lawyers instructed only by the families of the victims be given the opportunity to question the investigators, security officials, witnesses and politicians.

The secret documents, the hidden files, the bribes, the inconsistencies, the contradictions require thorough examination in an open forum.

Is it cynical to assume the re-opening of the investigation is a deliberate obstruction tactic?


The government has to realise that people are no longer prepared to tolerate their lieing machinations .. hence the winter of discontent coming up ...
Editor
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Editor » Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:36 am

Is title correct ? Does "sorry" translate to an "apology" when the same sentence disclaims responsibility ?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... tcher.html
Gaddafi apologises for the shooting of Wpc Yvonne Fletcher

Col Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan leader, has apologised for the first time for the shooting of Wpc Yvonne Fletcher.

"She is not an enemy to us, and we are sorry all the time and our sympathy, because she was on duty, she was there to protect the Libyan Embassy, but this is the problem that should be solved, but who did it? That is the question."


Is the MSM twisting words to fit an anti-Libyan agenda?

Update :

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 890225.ece
Gaddafi apologises for WPC Yvonne Fletcher's murder

Colonel Muammur Gaddafi has apologised for the first time for the killing of WPC Yvonne Fletcher who was shot outside the Libyan embassy in London in 1984.

However in an interview with Sky television the Libyan leader also stressed that the young police woman's killer had never been identified.


Ony the Telegraph and the Times seem to be using the word "apologise" .. are they both following the same central government dictate ?
Editor
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Red Dawn » Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:25 pm

26 Oct 2009

"Exclusive: To have your cake and eat it? by Jim Swire"

"Dr Jim Swire doubts the sincerity of the Crown Office's announcement that a fresh investigation would be carried out into the Lockerbie event."...

http://www.firmmagazine.com/features/63 ... y_Jim.html



01 Nov 2009

"Chomsky says US intelligence evidence cast doubt on Megrahi conviction"

"In correspondence to The Firm after the publication of its report which suggested there was sufficient evidence to warrant a fresh investigation into the possibility that the plane may have been destroyed by the accidental detonation of an illicit cargo of munitions components, Chomsky told the Firm he had little faith in the version of events promoted by US and UK authorities."...

http://www.firmmagazine.com/news/1767/C ... ction.html
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite"
Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) ... http://bigeye.com/foolisholdman.htm
Red Dawn
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:37 pm

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Editor » Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:56 pm

The Firm Magazine should be given an award for journalistic reporting of a miscarriage of justice ..
Editor
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:45 pm

Re: Lockerbie Thread on WPN forums

Postby Red Dawn » Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:16 pm

31 Oct 2009

"He added that he had sympathy with those who suspect a politically driven cover-up concerning Lockerbie"...

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/poli ... e-1.929618
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite"
Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) ... http://bigeye.com/foolisholdman.htm
Red Dawn
 
Posts: 4636
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:37 pm

PreviousNext

Return to WorldPressNetwork.net Forums

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests